Today’s topic is more from business view. Business is undergoing a transformation from the industrial to the information age. IT has opened possibilities for new business solutions. Almost every business offices now are using computers for a better performance, and obviously, they need a network to connect their computers to the Internet.
So, for a new small business network design, which is better Client/Server or Browser/Server? Some people will say there is no right answer. To me, I say, both. Please bear in mind, when I say ‘both’, the premise is for small business offices. Maybe for medium and large business groups, the difference in cost is significant, but for a small business, hundreds pounds is not a big deal. I will explore the advantages and disadvantages of these two models in following part.
The client/server architecture is already in full force and is not leaving any facet of the computer industry untouched. This model allows for quicker response time in the application as the data from the server to the client is transmitted much faster (usually 100 Mbits/second). The newer client/server products (developed in JAVA and Microsoft.net) have the speed of a local system plus the accessibility from a remote location. The disadvantages, obviously your data has risks like theft, fire, harddrive failure and data corruption. Cost? You will need PCs anyway, who will buy 1,000 pounds PC for office use?
Some people says now is the client/server computing era, for example, Orfail, Harkey and Edwards, with no offence, when they said that was 1999. Now there is a trend to use web browser as the platform for business use, the leading person was Tim O’Reilly (forgive me if I am wrong, he’s the first one I heard about this from). As he said in 2005, ‘the bursting of the dot-com bubble in the fall of 2001 marked a turning point for the web… (Dale Dougherty) noted that far from having crashed, the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity’. Then here comes the web 2.0.
The first of the web 2.0 principles was ‘The web as platform’, let’s take google as an example, google began its life as a native web application, delivered service, with customers paying, directly or indirectly for the use of that service. Compare with old software industry, there are no software releases, no licensing, no sale, no porting the different platforms, all you need are internet and web browsers. How’s that, sounds good to me! As you know, if you buy a PC, you still need to pay the nearly the same, or even more amount money for the software!
The central principle of web 2.0 is it embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence. Google again, use PageRank method (using link structure of the web) to provide better search results; eBay and Amazon, use collective activity of all users and user engagement system; Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia which using radical experiment in trust to allow users to added an entry and edited by any other; more example like del.icio.us and Flickr, have pioneered a concept which called ‘folksonomy’. All these successful companies could tell us, network effects from user contributions are the key to market dominance in the web 2.0 era.
Too tired, to be continue…
Your footprint